Will missteps undercut public confidence in a new course on health care?

price-245x300We’re dizzily trying  to keep track of all the ways that the new administration is defying the best hopes that it will pursue a health care policy that is fair, open, responsive, and based in evidence, research, and scientific expertise — not partisanship and knee-jerk. Compounding the confusion is that as soon as many of these missteps occur, they then are reversed, or maybe re-reversed. Is this the way to build the public’s confidence in any new course on health care?

A prospective leader with big ethical challenges

  • Yes, every president deserves the privilege of selecting his Cabinet officers, and the U.S. Senate, while advising and consenting, must to a degree defer to presidential picks. But Tom Price, the nominee to head the trillion-dollar Health and Human Services Department, even if confirmed, has launched poorly into his prospective top position. He did say he supports vaccinations and does not believe the debunked theory that shots cause autism or diseases. But he has offered a woeful lack of information about the administration’s plans on the much-publicized GOP repeal and replacement of Obamacare. He’s been equally blank about what’s ahead for Medicaid and Medicare, as well as how vigorously he might protect the public from bad drugs or dangerous medical devices.
  • Meantime, evidence grows by the day about this nominee’s ethical challenges. Bigly. With his myopia that what’s good for doctors is the best policy course to be pursued, including in seeking to restrict the rights of patients harmed in medical services to seek legal redress, he also sees no issue with buying stock in health care companies, then legislating in ways that affect them — and at times his own orthopedic practice. The nominee is so out of touch that he can’t see the wrong in participating in a sweetheart stock deal with an Australian biotech firm, again that he legislates for, and is unperturbed by his failure to accurately report just how much he profited. His defense of his dubious dealings —that his stock broker made arm-length picks on his behalf—has been nothing less than lame. His defenders, of course, have made the situation more appalling. It’s time to get out a big broom when senators see no wrong if they or their buds vastly enrich themselves during their public service. What’s that plumber fellow in the Midwest think now about senators and Cabinet nominees who throw around stock deals worth five or six times an ordinary guy’s $50,000 annual pay? Price appears headed to confirmation. If he becomes HHS secretary, he’s have his work cut out for him, just to restore his damaged credibility.

Gag orders for scientists are just wrong

  • It’s just plain wrong as can be, in my view, for the GOP to muzzle government scientists and experts who we the taxpayers support, whether they are at the Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services Department, Environmental Protection Agency, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the Agriculture Department. Yes, there is a transition period under way. But America’s new leaders severely undercut citizens’ national confidence in them when they issue edicts gagging experts, then reverse those orders, or then say, well, maybe they’re just interim. This is unacceptable, particularly efforts to cut off vital contacts by federal agencies with Congress and the public’s surrogates, the media. (This issue has been much covered in the media, thankfully, so I won’t clutter this item with the many links to stories about the various agencies). Partisans may disagree about policy matters as huge as climate change. But slashing the Environmental Protection Agency and seeking to micromanage or throttle its expertise makes zero sense as the nation confronts pollution of its air and water and the safety of its workers. Consider that a recent study suggests a link between air pollution and Alzheimer’s.

An unwise cut-off, reversal on Obamacare outreach

Across-the-board hiring freezes are ill-considered

Creeping presence of anti-vaxers is just creepy

Patrick Malone & Associates, P.C. listed in Best Lawyers Rated by Super Lawyers Patrick A. Malone
Washingtonian Top Lawyer 2011
Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb Top Attorney Best Lawyers Firm
Contact Information